When an org's security personnel carry out threat modeling exercises, they tend to make unconscious assumptions about the efficacy of their own security controls. This is dangerous.
If <that one PAM tool everyone uses> was good enough on its own, then no one in banking would get hacked, because they all use it. Clearly there's more to the story.
Ground-breaking paradigms from Jericho Forum are still meaningful today, but some more than others. How have things evolved since then, and why does it matter?